Knowledge page
6 common pitfalls to avoid in your internal communication
Good internal communication is often noticeable simply because work flows more smoothly. Employees know what’s going on, what’s expected of them, and where to find the right information. When communication breaks down, it’s all the more noticeable. Questions are repeated, important information is missed, and minor ambiguities grow into major problems. Here are six common pitfalls and what you can do to avoid them
1. You're communicating too much with too many people
More information isn’t always better information. When your employees are faced with a constant stream of news, emails, chat messages, and notifications, it becomes difficult to determine what’s actually important.
The problem is that employees quickly learn that much of the information they receive doesn’t apply to them. This increases the risk that they’ll also miss what’s actually relevant. The solution isn’t to stop communicating, but to prioritise more clearly.
Consider:
- Who needs the information?
- What does the recipient need to do?
- When does the message need to be delivered?
- Which channel is best suited?
With effective internal communication, employees don’t have to sift through all the news themselves to find what’s relevant. No one needs to read about the parking lot construction at
2. You inform rather than communicate
Publishing a text does not necessarily mean that you have communicated effectively. A message has not automatically been received just because it is posted on the intranet or sent in an email.
The recipient needs to understand:
- why the information is important
- how it affects their workday
- whether anything is expected of them
- where they can ask questions
Good internal communication provides context. It makes it easier to understand not only what is happening, but also why and what it means. This is especially important during times of change. A new way of working is rarely made any clearer by describing it in a 20-page document.
3. Information is everywhere
Email. Chat. Shared folders. Document management. Intranet. Local systems. Meeting notes. When information is spread across many channels, it becomes difficult to know which version is current. Employees start saving their own copies or asking a colleague just to be safe. This quickly leads to parallel information channels where old documents continue to lead a surprisingly active life.
Create a clear location for quality-assured and up-to-date information. Other channels can be used to alert employees that something has happened. But the information itself should have a clear home to which employees are directed. It should be easy to find the right version—not a detective’s work.
4. No one owns the content
Outdated information is a common source of frustration and uncertainty. Procedures change, contact persons leave, and documents become outdated. If no one is responsible for the content, incorrect information can remain online for a long time.
For every important page or section of information, there must therefore be clearly designated content owners. It must be made clear who is responsible for updating the content, how often it should be reviewed, and what happens when the information is no longer current.
Clear content responsibility not only improves quality—it also builds trust. Your employees should be able to feel confident that what they find is actually accurate.
5. Communication flows only from the top down
Internal communication is still sometimes treated like a one-way broadcast. Management speaks. Employees listen. But a positive employee experience requires dialogue. People need to be able to ask questions, share experiences, and provide feedback. Otherwise, the organisation risks missing both important perspectives and early warning signs.
So create space for comments, questions, surveys, and conversations. Also, make sure someone follows up on the input received.
6. You measure activity instead of impact
Many organisations track how many news articles are published or how many mailings are sent out. But as mentioned earlier, a lot of communication does not automatically mean good communication. What matters is what the communication leads to.
Are employees finding the right information? Do they understand what they’re supposed to do? Is the number of recurring questions decreasing? Do they feel more involved? Combine statistics with interviews, surveys, and feedback from the organisation.
Page views may show that someone has opened a news item. That doesn’t tell you whether the person understood it.
Here's how you can tell that communication isn't working
There are some clear signs that internal communication needs to be reviewed:
- the same questions keep coming up across multiple channels
- employees are using outdated documents
- important information is being missed
- the intranet is perceived as difficult to navigate
- employees say they receive too much information
- At the same time, employees say they don’t know what’s going on
This last combination may seem contradictory, but it’s actually more common than you might think. The problem is rarely a lack of information. More often, the problem is a lack of relevant, clear, and accessible information.
Better internal communication starts with the employee
It’s easy to start with the organisation’s needs. What do we want to say? What do we need to publish? What message does management want to convey? But truly effective internal communication starts at the other end.
What do employees need to understand? What information do they need to be able to act? What does the workday look like once the message is received? When communication is built around the recipient’s reality, it becomes clearer and more useful. This creates better conditions for engagement, collaboration, and trust.
Tip!
Curious about what the path to successful internal communication might look like? Check out our case study where Skistar shares its journey from paper binders to push notifications, using a mobile app that fosters inclusion across the entire organization.